The
book of Job teaches that not all those who suffer are either punished or
abandoned by God. Jesus taught on this subject (John 9:2; Luke 13:1-6) in his
lead up to the cross. In Luke 13, when commenting upon Pilate’s evil, he warns
about what could happen to the entire nation (vv. 1 & 5). In Jesus’
prophetic work, he called Israel to abandon its ethnocentric violence. He saw
that Israel’s revolutionary approach towards Rome was leading to destruction. In
one way, his crucifixion was an enacted parable (like his “Temple Cleansing”), representing
Rome’s eventual destruction of ancient Israel. Jesus says as much in Luke 23:28-31,
quoting the Hosea 10:8 prediction of the Israel’s destruction by Assyria (v.
30; see also Rev 6:16) and basically saying, “If they do this to one who is innocent
(Luke 23:4, 14, 22, 47), what will they do to the truly guilty?” (v. 31).
Importantly,
Jesus was punished for being a false messiah/king (Luke 22:67, 70f; 23:2). That
was the charge leveled at him. That was the sign above the cross, that was the
reason for the mocking. At his trial Jesus affirms the reason for the charge,
citing Dan 7:13 & Ps 110:1 (see Luke 20:42; 21:27). Jesus’ death on the cross
is deemed evidence that he is not the Messiah/king (Matt 27:40, 42f; Mark 15:32;
Luke 23:35, 37, 39). Because he does die on the cross, people then believed he was
not the Messiah, therefore the punishment was just. That’s the logic of the thinking.
Significantly,
in Mark 15:34, Jesus cries out in Aramaic “Eloi, Eloi, Lama Sabachthani?” Mark then
translates this into Greek (ho theos mou ho theos mou). Why give the
Aramaic at all? Because in v. 35, people who originally heard Jesus speak think
he’s calling out for Eli-jah to save him. Eloi-Eli. The recording of the Eloi-Eli
mishearing points to the fact that everyone misunderstood what was occurring. The
people there at the crucifixion misinterpreted the event. “Eloi, Eloi” is a quote
from Psalm 22:1. Read Psalm 22 in its entirety. In verses 1-23, because of his
affliction it appears as if the psalmist has been abandoned by God. But then comes
v. 24: “For he has not despised nor abhorred the affliction of the afflicted; nor
has he hidden his face from him; but when he cried to him for help, he heard.” Indeed,
the psalmist’s affliction becomes a poetic representation of all the poor and
afflicted (vv. 24, 26). God hears the poor and afflicted, they will receive
help, and God deserves praise because of it (v. 25). Then comes the startling
predictions of vv. 27-31. The gentiles will turn towards God in worship (v. 27).
The Kingdom is God’s; he rules over the nations (v. 28). Even those who died
will worship God (v. 29). God’s covenant-faithfulness will be proclaimed (v.
31). What Jesus meant by referencing Psalm 22 is now clear: “If you think God
has abandoned me because of my affliction, you are wrong. He hasn’t abandoned me.
This is how the Kingdom comes, the gentiles turn to God, the resurrection
comes, and God is true to the covenant.”
That
interpretation of the crucifixion shouldn’t surprise us. That meaning is found
in Daniel 7 (which Jesus references). And the concept of the crucifixion leading
to exaltation is found in 1 Pet 2-3; Phil 2; Eph 1:19-23; Col 2:15; 1 Cor 15; Rom
8; Mark 10:35-45; Matt 20:20-28. In many of these same places, the suffering/submission/selflessness
that leads to exaltation is deemed a model the disciples of Jesus are to
follow. Jesus himself made it a requirement (Matt 10:38; 16:24; Mark 8:34; Luke
9:23; 14:27). In Mark 10:35-40 and Matt 20:21ff, Jesus predicted the cross is
where he’d be enthroned in his kingdom. The description of the crucifixion is
that of a macabre coronation (Matt 27:27-31; cf. Mark 15:16-20; John 19:1-5). This
method of “suffering leading to exaltation” is one that Peter initially rejected
(Matt 16:21-28; Mark 8:31-38), but later accepted (1 Pet 2-3). But again, at Christ’s
crucifixion, everyone misunderstood. Like Job’s three friends, they saw the suffering
as just punishment.
When
God resurrected Jesus from the dead, he was reversing the charge. God was the
higher court reversing the verdict of the lower court. He was saying that Jesus
was innocent of the charge. The punishment had been unjust. It was vindication,
just as in Dan 7. Again, Jesus was punished to death for claiming to be the Messiah,
the king, the “son of God” (Mark 14:61; Matt 26:63; Luke 22:70; John 19:7). The
resurrection proved that Jesus was who he claimed to be (Rom 1:4; 1 Tim 3:16; 1
Cor 15:3-4). His suffering and punishment were unjust.
The
problems with Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA) are legion (so to speak). To
limit the mentions to the current discussion, we note that the suffering of the
cross is programmatic for disciples as a method for victory over the powers of
evil. Also, per the Book of Job, Psalm 22, and the teachings of Jesus, the
existence of suffering is not necessarily evidence of divine punishment. Furthermore,
the meaning of Psalm 22 argues that (in my nod to Twain) appearances of divine
abandonment are greatly exaggerated. Most importantly, if you say that God
punished Jesus, then, from a historic point of view, you are unintentionally implying
that God agreed with the charge that Jesus was a false Messiah. Indeed, you are
making the same mistake as those who mistook Eloi for Eli. Please. Let us abandon
PSA. Our God and Christ has given us a method of ending evil. Let the bravest believers
adopt it for victory (Ps 110; Dan 7; Rom 8; 1 Cor 10; 1 Pet 3; Rev 21-22).